In the article titled "Negative and Positive Online Patient Reviews of Physicians—1 vs 5 Stars," an incorrect type of online review cited has been corrected. In the Results section, "33 of 152 comments (21.7%) accompanied 5-star reviews based on how honest the physician seemed to be" has been changed to "33 of 152 comments (21.7%) accompanied 5-star reviews based on how knowledgeable the physician seemed to be." This article has been corrected online.
from A1 via xlomafota.13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2lvwsfE
via IFTTT
http://ift.tt/2lvHa5J
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις
-
Abstract A novel analytical-scale concept to improve reliability of detection and analysis of natural and processed wastewater samples from...
-
Related Articles Individual Differences in Verbal and Non-Verbal Affective Responses to Smells: Influence of Odor Label Across Culture...
-
Related Articles Sulphur dioxide and arsenic affect male reproduction via interfering with spermatogenesis in mice. Ecotoxicol Enviro...
-
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is one of the most potent endogenous vasodilators identified to date. The present study elucidates th...
-
Publication date: February 2017 Source: Research in Developmental Disabilities, Volume 61 Author(s): Manya Jyotishi, Deborah A. Fein, Leti...
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου