Oral Appliances in Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Respiratory Arousals

Effectiveness of 

Study Objectives:

To compare adherence and treatment effects with an oral appliance (OA) in patients with different types of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): those with mainly respiratory arousals (“arousers”), and those with oxygen desaturations (“desaturaters”) at polysomnography (PSG).

Methods:

A prospective intervention study on 72 “tired snorers” with “normal” home sleep study (HSS), but later diagnosed as OSA with PSG, who accepted OA treatment. They were offered evaluation with a follow-up PSG and questionnaires, including the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), general health (GH), satisfaction, and side effects.

Results:

Sixty-six patients, 33 arousers and 33 desaturaters, were adapted to OA. The 1-year adherence rate was significantly higher among arousers (85%) than desaturaters (55%) (p = 0.034). Thirty-six of 66 patients underwent follow-up PSG; the apnea-hypopnea index was significantly reduced in 22 arousers from a median of 14 to 3 (p < 0.001), and in 14 desaturaters from 18 to 7 (p = 0.002; no significant group difference). ESS and GH showed no significant improvements in either group, although sleepy “arousers” (ESS ≥ 10) significantly improved their ESS. In total, 77% reported side effects, while 63% were still satisfied with the OA treatment. Gender analysis showed a significant dominance of females classified as “arousers” (p = 0.025).

Conclusions:

OSA patients with mainly arousals at PSG showed higher adherence to OA treatment, compared to patients with desaturations. Both groups responded similarly to treatment: improved nocturnal respiration, but only a small reduction of symptoms. We suggest that “tired snorers” with “normal HSS” should be offered PSG, and if OSA, also OA treatment.

Citation:

Nerfeldt P, Friberg D. Effectiveness of oral appliances in obstructive sleep apnea with respiratory arousals. J Clin Sleep Med 2016;12(8):1159–1165.

http://ift.tt/2burCsz