Gender bias in scholarly peer review.

Related Articles

Gender bias in scholarly peer review.

Elife. 2017 Mar 21;6:

Authors: Helmer M, Schottdorf M, Neef A, Battaglia D

Abstract
Peer review is the cornerstone of scholarly publishing and it is essential that peer reviewers are appointed on the basis of their expertise alone. However, it is difficult to check for any bias in the peer-review process because the identity of peer reviewers generally remains confidential. Here, using public information about the identities of 9000 editors and 43000 reviewers from the Frontiers series of journals, we show that women are underrepresented in the peer-review process, that editors of both genders operate with substantial same-gender preference (homophily), and that the mechanisms of this homophily are gender-dependent. We also show that homophily will persist even if numerical parity between genders is reached, highlighting the need for increased efforts to combat subtler forms of gender bias in scholarly publishing.

PMID: 28322725 [PubMed - in process]

from Head and Neck on PubMed via xlomafota13 on Inoreader http://ift.tt/2nGq0V4


http://ift.tt/2mwjCzT